Wednesday, October 16, 2013

Warren Buffett slams idiocy in Washington over debt limit

Warren Buffett slams idiocy in Washington over debt limit

October 16, 2013, 8:52 AM
Bloomberg News
Warren Buffett
Billionaire Warren Buffett slammed lawmakers for idiocy in using the debt-limit as leverage in a political dispute “over some extraneous matter.”
“It is a mistake to suspend activity in the United States over something that is unthinkable to do,” Buffett said in an interview with CNBC.
It can take “20 minutes” to ruin a reputation for paying obligations that the U.S. has built up over 237 years, he said.
He described threatening a default as “poison gas” and “a political weapon of mass destruction.”
Lawmakers must come together and agree never to use the threat again.
“There are certain weapons that are just improper to use,” Buffett said.
Buffett said there was no need to stop investing because of the “mess” in Washington.
“It is perfectly OK to buy securities,” he said. “It is not necessarily a mistake to buy stocks because you don’t know the outcome of something that is happening in Congress.”
The chairman of Berkshire Hathaway /quotes/zigman/219651 /quotes/nls/brk.a BRKA said there has already been “tiny bit of damage” from the debt-limit standoff and that the economy would be hurt if Congress fails to reach a deal before Thursday, when the Treasury says it will have trouble meeting its financial obligations.
A protracted crisis without a debt-ceiling increase would cause chaos over time, he said.
Earlier on Wednesday, Berkshire’s Marmon Group arm announced it is buying the drinks dispensing division of U.K.-based IMI /quotes/zigman/154461 UK:IMI for $1.1 billion.
“We did not buy it with a condition that we could call off the deal if there was a no vote on the debt limit change,” Buffett said.
Buffett once again threw his weight behind J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. CEO Jamie Dimon. “You cannot be active in a big business without making some mistakes,” he said. “And sometimes there will be big ones, but you have to look at the whole record.”
Buffett has said in the past that he personally owns shares of J.P. Morgan /quotes/zigman/272085 /quotes/nls/jpm JPM .
— Greg Robb
Follow Greg on Twitter @grobb2000
Follow Capitol Report @capitolreport

Story Conversation

Commenting FAQs »
82 comments
89 people listening
Timothy corrigan
Timothy corrigan user
Bungling Buffet is a leftist who refuses to pay his share of taxes. He takes a salary of $200k a year and pays little to no taxes of any consequences. He shelters his income from charitable contributions of stock, not cash. Buffest is a POS
john doey
john doey user
The deniers would deny, if the were standing in the Arctic in bermuda shorts. Just reading some of these comments on how they think Government finances work makes you wonder what Civil War bunker they crawled out of
rick mueller
rick mueller user
Someone once said: "we get the government we deserve". Hopefullly people voting Republican in the past will remember next time. Not saying they don't have some valid points, but how they go about the process is just wrong.
John Newman
John Newman user
@rick mueller
Really? I'm not a GOP old guard Repub supporter, but you don't think Reid mindlessly refusing to take a vote on ANYTHING sent to the Senate isn't obstructionist and being a part of this whole thing?!
What about a bureaucrat and politician stating "I refuse to negotiate" - Barry Obama. THAT's not part of the problem?!
Dude, you need to pull the political bias hood off your head and look at the real world now and then.

Scott Harris
Scott Harris user
I don't get the whole barry thing...oh well. GOP in congrees need to realize that the dems are not going to negotiate on ACA, and they don't need to because it is law.
Nimesh Patel
Nimesh Patel user
Oh yeah, the law. Barry only follows the laws he likes and directs his attorney general to go after people enforcing the laws he doesn't like. The ACA law says that companies need to pay a penalty for not complying with "the law". Unless of course you are a friend of Barry like most of Wall Street.
David Wooten
David Wooten user
" It can take “20 minutes” to ruin a reputation for paying obligations that the U.S. has built up over 237 years, (Buffet) said.
(Buffet) described threatening a default as “poison gas” and “a political weapon of mass destruction.” "
You're a liar, Warren. The Treasury takes in several times as much revenue as is required to service the bonds. They can pay the bondholders and they will pay them - whether or not the credit limit (debt ceiling) is raised. You know this perfectly well.
I wish your Daddy were alive, Warren. He'd spank you well (and properly) for telling so many lies, and for encouraging the government to loot Americans and buy you and your buddies to keep themselves in power.

Ralph Romano
Ralph Romano user
@David Wooten Does the treasury take in enough to refund the debt if lenders lose faith in the US, refuse to roll over what comes due and demand immediate payment ?
David Wooten
David Wooten user
@Ralph Romano @David Wooten Rolling over debt does not have to mean rolling it over to the same party that wants the principle (and gets it). 'New' debt to replace old debt could simply be sold on the market. Since the old debt was paid off, the total public debt would be unaffected and not result in a breach of the credit limit (debt ceiling).
However, given that the Senate is now going to approve a measure that allows the president to increase the debt ceiling any time he wants unless Congress overrules him with a 2/3 vote, I would, frankly, prefer to let the bondholders just twist in the wind (after I sell mine tomorrow).

SC COX
SC COX user
Warren Buffett has forgotten more about business than most people know. As a long-term major holder of BRKB, not only has this man made me a lot of money but I'm sure he would be better at handling our country's economy than the dolts that are there now. Instead of hiring a "financial advisor" you'd be better served by imitating Mr. Buffet. In Warren I trust
Brian Meynell
Brian Meynell user
@SC COX There was a article on MW recently detailing how much money Buffets company had made from supporting GS and other financial corporations immediately after 2008, and it was speculated by commentors that he had benefited from "inside knowledge" about who the FED was going to "look after".
Nimesh Patel
Nimesh Patel user
Buffet only cares about making money. He is the ultimate insider in government and business. Any fool can make money if he knows what laws are coming and knows where the TARP money actually went.
SC COX
SC COX user
@Nimesh Patel Nimesh, Warren Buffett has made me hundreds of thousand dollars since 1984. My family & I could not care less about your opinions. You are simply on the outside looking in. Your loss, my friend
Nimesh Patel
Nimesh Patel user
Believe me when I say, I'm happy your family has financial security. It's too bad that Barry and Warren have so decisively slammed the door behind them so that others can never attain the same security. Oh yes, they say they are for fairness and equality, but only the select few have access. That is why "I" am on the outside with the rest of the hordes and our children.
SC COX
SC COX user
@Nimesh Patel Nimesh, BRKB is available to anyone. Granted, I have an MBA but blame your financial advisor, not me or Barack Obama. Learn to invest wisely & you too can be a millionaire & retire at 55. Neither of my parents graduated high school, so I am truly self-made. Quit blaming others for your shortcomings. If you want to play with the big boys, you have to raise your game
Bob Jan
Bob Jan user
Ted Cruz has you people going in circles. He's gotten all of you to take eye off the ball while he dribbles it in another direction. His wife, Heidi Nelson Cruz is a "bigwig" at Goldman Sachs in the investment department. Remember them? They're the ones with the CD Swaps that just about brought down the entire world. Oh but that's not important. Let's stay on course to deny people health coverage even though we don't have one idea about what to do about it. Funny that the ACA is very similar to Romney Care. Very similar to what the conservative Heritage foundation had proposed. But whoa there fella! A black man is going to do it so now we're all against it. Yes sir, let's beat him down every last chance we can. We're going to make him a one-term Prez. LOL. How'd that all work out McConnell. Republicans lost and they just can't get over it. They're still whining.
glenn evans
glenn evans user
@Bob Jan And dog dung appears similar to fudge on first glance. Doesn't mean its the same. No matter who the baker is.
Bob Jan
Bob Jan user
@glenn evans @Bob Jan I'll bet Goldman loves having a Senator in their back pocket.
And you need your eyes checked, if not your nose. That was a bad illustration/comparison.
Bob Jan
Bob Jan user
so paying the bills due on the 2 wars, the 2 tax cuts, the Part D drug giveaway to the BIG PHARMA'S, TSA and Homeland Security are unacceptable??? Well then, the Congress and Prez and VP shouldn't have enacted them.
Bill Udy
Bill Udy user
Plunging the nation ever deeper into unpayable debt in order to fund current government expenses is also destructive, even more so than the current crisis.
There is a price to pay for this debt, not only by our children and grandchildren, but by us, right now, in the form of ever growing interest payments, and eventual currency and economic collapse.

Bob Jan
Bob Jan user
@Bill Udy well then, stop electing knuckleheads to the Congress.
Roy Anderberg
Roy Anderberg user
@Bob Jan @Bill Udy The general public has become apathetic and it will take nothing short of a miricle to restore what the Democrats and weak kneed Republicans have destroyed in order to get re-elected......Very Sad, I may never see, "Made in USA" again.
Fred Johnson
Fred Johnson user
Yeah, whatever, Buffet. You are nothing more than a spokesperson for the DFL. If it makes YOUR stocks go up you are happy, even if it bankrupts taxpayers.
glenn evans
glenn evans user
Buffet has shown himself to be nothing more than an obama ho the entire time the president has been in power. He is bought and paid for so his comments are no more valuable than Jay Carney.
Peter Stride
Peter Stride user
Our modern global economy is a vast complicated entity.....and no...the dummies in Washington and the dummies on MW don't have a clue.
Mr. Babommer
Mr. Babommer user
Old Warren is talking about how terrible this is???? oh my..... now aside from the BullS.... ask him how many times he has threatened other coporations or business deals with non payment or how many times he has held his hands around another company's throat in closing a devestiture or acquisition? Someone should squash his disgusting head.
lee denise
lee denise user
weapon of mass destruction? Yup destroying the wealthy even more as most of the poor already suffered the consequences when they printed free money and the rich is getting a lot richer. So Warren buffet better keep his mouth shut
Chiman Patel
Chiman Patel user
I have been telling this since long time that listen to old man.He has wisdom and experience of successful investor.His futuristic views are correct and on time.
Roy Anderberg
Roy Anderberg user
@Chiman Patel Sorry to dissapoint you, but his views are for himself and his billions.
Why hasn't he spoken out with great passion about reducing government spending, reducing entitlements, reducing debt, controling the waste, fraud, and abuse, and then finally spending some of his money to help in those areas?

Jack Fox
Jack Fox user
Warren wants it both ways, gov't to promote Wall St. and gov't to stay out of Wall St. He might take a dent today if the gov't doesn't keep it's bond rating.
Aspen Pittman
Aspen Pittman user
Short and sweet, for the MW editors who have blocked my 4 previous comments:
The Debt ceiling has nothing to do with default on our (already massive) debt. The interest payments, now about 30% of our revenues, come first. That is the LAW.
This debate only affects new (massive Progressive unsustainable entitlement) spending. If we do not raise the credit card limits, we will have to do without more cake for the Takers. This is not a bad thing, this is a good thing.
Buffet KNOWS this, Obama, Reed and Pelosi KNOW this along with most the MSM.
Saying anything otherwise is..."misrepresentation" (the PC word for it)
Congress is doing their job, we should let them! And, we should applaud all those there who have fiscal sanity, and toss out all those fools who do not.

Cary Doyle
Cary Doyle user
@Aspen Pittman If Congress really was doing their job we would not be seeing this kind of blackmail. The full faith, and credit of the nation is not a bargaining point to be used in a game of political one upmanship.



Jeff Miller
Jeff Miller user
@Cary Doyle @Aspen Pittman What you call "blackmail" is really the give and take of political disagreements. The credit of the nation is always a bargaining point as it should be. Some of us believe the USA's credit rating should tank IF the debt limit is raised. My credit score would be harmed if I take on too much debt. But then I'm not government just a taxpayer.
Cary Doyle
Cary Doyle user
@Jeff Miller @Cary Doyle @Aspen Pittman Exactly right Jeff. You are not a government. To be more specific. You are not a government with the ability to print it's own currency. Greece being an example of a government that cannot.
The idea that the US, as a government that can print it's own currency defaulting on it's debt is absurd. Especially when that currency is the de-facto global reserve currency. Any indication by the government that we will not pay our bills is a signal that that non-payment is purely willful since we can always print more money, or add another zero to the balance sheet.
In other words we are just telling our creditors we refuse, or are thinking about refusing to pay.
What you are saying is that we should debate whether to be a willfully deadbeat nation, or not. As supposedly the worlds "greatest nation" do you really think that is the image we should project?

Jeff Miller
Jeff Miller user
@Cary Doyle @Jeff Miller @Aspen Pittman Yep! If that's what it takes to get the government to live within our means, then yes, absolutely. My responsibility is to my country first not the world.
The idea that a label, "greatest nation" should be arbitrarily defined as spending without limit is absurd. The debate is not really whether to pay our bills or not it is whether we should incur those bills in the first place.
And yeah, of course I understand I'm not government and can't print currency. Not legally anyhow. But as a taxpayer I stand liable for the value of all the currency being printed by the government and it is my duty to ensure that value is maintained for today and all tomorrows.

Ralph Romano
Ralph Romano user
@Aspen Pittman What happens if the interest payment comes before the revenue ? Interest payments and government revenue are not evenly distributed over each day of the year.
Roy Anderberg
Roy Anderberg user
OK, so when do we quit our excessive spending? Warren's main concern is the fear of losing his billions like the rich did in the last depression. He and will say anything to avoid a personal loss in stocks.
So, when do we limit our credit card purchases? When do we quit our deficit spending? Why don't we deserve a downgrade? We do!!! We simply continue the waste, fraud, and abuse. We fight wars that we have no business in, we splurge building mosques and buying prayer rugs, but we will not bring home that money and fix a broken ecomomy. What we really need is a reset button called a depression and once again get things on a level playing field for all. By now we would be coming out of it in a real world, with real opportunities and less government and more fairness,

Apple Tree
Apple Tree user
the congressional reps are responsibly listening to the constituents who are fed up with federal waste, fraud and spiraling debt.
no sympathy for the caterer in DC who is lamenting fewer tax payer funded Christmas parties - please - she sounded insane

Aspen Pittman
Aspen Pittman user
Interesting first for MW, 4 posts this morning, all marked PENDING...so much for free speech
J Lee
J Lee user
Good old boy trying to protect his own financial rear end. He has lobbied the Obama administration and given advice to make sure Berkshire gets the best return possible.
Bob Jan
Bob Jan user
@J Lee He's also got tens of thousands of investors who he's also concerned for. Too bad our Congress didn't feel the same about their constituents instead of their "campaign donors". Then maybe we wouldn't be in the mess we're now in.
Roy Anderberg
Roy Anderberg user
@Bob Jan @J Lee Bob Jan, Bob Jan, We are in the mess because government spends too much, taxes too much, and interferes too much, and finally, the Feds keep right on printing money trying to raise a sinking ship.
Show More Comments

About Capitol Report

  • Capitol Report is a round-up of news and analysis provided by MarketWatch reporters, editors and commentators based in our Washington, D.C bureau and throughout the U.S.
    Follow us on Twitter:

Search MarketWatch Blogs

Partner Center

No comments:

Post a Comment