|
Posted: 16 Oct 2013 04:00 AM
PDT
Today we are pleased to
have Miranda Marquit, a financial writer for RateZip.com, as our guest
blogger. - The KCM Crew
Though
it may feel like yesterday, it's been about half a decade since the housing
bubble burst and the subprime mortgage crisis hit. In September 2008, the
United States government took over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Since then,
the mortgage industry has undergone fundamental changes, experiencing both
increased regulation and a large shift toward nationalization. To give you an
idea of the size of these changes, in 2006 around 30%
of mortgage loans in the US were backed by a government guarantee. This
number rose to around 90% in 2012.
Private vs.
Government Funding
As we move further from the
financial crisis, it makes sense to start asking if and when the mortgage
industry will return to a world where private money plays a greater role and
government institutions such as Fannie, Freddie, and the Federal Housing
Administration (FHA) play a smaller one. Recently, our representatives in
Washington have begun to discuss plans to dissolve
Fannie and Freddie and bring private money back into the game, and that's a
good start. In the past few months, we've also seen a few encouraging trends
in the jumbo mortgage market that could point toward a mortgage industry less
reliant on government guarantees.
Jumbo Mortgages
If you're not familiar with a
jumbo mortgage, the entire concept revolves around the type of loans that
Fannie and Freddie are willing to guarantee. Fannie and Freddie will
guarantee loans only up to $417,000 in value (sometimes more, but not
important for this discussion), and these are referred to as conventional
mortgages. A jumbo mortgage refers to one with a higher loan amount,
typically $417,000 to $750,000, and these are not backed by a government
guarantee. Prior to the financial crisis, jumbo loans were priced around .25%
higher than conforming. After the financial crisis, the gap has widened to as
much as 1.8%, just one more indicator of the flight of private capital.
Latest Trend
In September, something
changed – by some measures, the rates on jumbo mortgages actually fell below
the rates on equivalent conventional loans. This phenomena was covered in
many media outlets, and you can read more detail here and here. As of this writing, the rates on a
few popular websites are almost too close to tell the difference, with 30
year fixed rate conventional mortgages at 4.28% and jumbo 30 year fixed rate
mortgages at 4.32%. Though it's only been one month, the fact that jumbo
mortgage rates did not immediately diverge from conventional rates is a sign
that we may be witnessing a trend.
There are countless ways to
interpret the closing spread between jumbo and conventional mortgage rates.
For example, banks with excess capital to lend may feel pressure to put this
money to work, which one could argue is leading to higher demand for jumbo
loans and thus lower rates. Another interesting interpretation, however, ties
back to Fannie and Freddie. In recent years, both institutions have raised
guarantee fees, the fees that are meant to compensate them for providing a
guarantee on a mortgage. This makes conventional loans more expensive, which
would help close the gap with jumbo loans in the other direction.
If you're in favor of more
private market involvement within the mortgage industry, you may be wondering
if falling jumbo mortgage rates are the first step in a path toward private
options for conventional loan amounts. After all, at some point working with
Fannie and Freddie may become prohibitively expensive, and the WSJ article
linked earlier mentioned a mortgage lender encouraging borrowers to borrow
more money to jump over conventional limits. It's far too early to tell, but
this trend certainly deserves attention over the coming months.
|
Wednesday, October 16, 2013
The curious case of the jumbo mortgage
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

No comments:
Post a Comment