Here's Why You SHOULD Listen To Billionaire Sheryl Sandberg On Gender
REUTERS/ Mike Segar
Her critics also say that she is
in the
1 percent and therefore not in a position to tell the rest of American
women, especially working-class women, what they ought to do. But her success is also precisely
why she is qualified to give this message.
Sandberg's message about the psychological constraints on women is certainly
real.
In her book, she shares the
moment this came into focus: It was a few years ago, during a meeting with
then-Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner. The women in the room chose to sit in
chairs surrounding the conference table, but not at the table itself. "Because
of their seating choice," she writes, "they seemed like spectators rather than
participants ... It was a watershed moment for me. A moment when I witnessed how
an internal barrier can alter women's behavior."
A major source of this behavior is what Sandberg calls the "stereotype
threat":
"The gender stereotypes introduced in
childhood are reinforced throughout our lives and become self-fulfilling
prophesies. Most leadership positions are held by men, so women don't
expect to achieve them, and that becomes one of the reasons they
don't."
The truth is that women leaders
are still few and far between, which is why they get so much attention. Just
look at Yahoo CEO Marissa
Mayer, who received a
ton of press this week over her work-from-home ban and who also has been
under close scrutiny since she started at Yahoo. We still aren't entirely
comfortable with the idea of women in power, and that will take time.
Another message Sandberg hits
home in her book — and in the "60 Minutes"
interview — is that women are often considered "lucky" for their successes,
whereas with men it's more about innate talent. At the end of the day, high
achievers, no matter what resources they've been given, all have to put in tons
of hours, and end up
creating their own luck.
Sandberg was smart enough to
take advantage of opportunities that came her way and develop relationships with
mentors like Larry Summers, Eric Schmidt,
and Mark
Zuckerberg, who told TIME that Sandberg "has an extremely
high IQ and EQ, and it’s just really rare to get that in any single
person.”
Forbes writer Meghan
Casserly says Sandberg's vision of a world where "half our institutions are run
by women and half our homes are run by men" is "more
aspirational than inspirational." But so are many powerful ideas. By laying
out a vision of what real equality looks like, Sandberg shows just how far away
from it we really are. She doesn't impress her view as an ultimatum, and says
that achieving her vision is not reasonable across the socioeconomic spectrum,
at least today.
The biggest problem with her book is that, although she gives some great
anecdotes about some challenges she's had to overcome, even more honesty would
make her story more powerful and Sandberg more relatable. Casserly writes
that:
"I’d
love to read about Sandberg’s career moves at 29. What did she learn as an
assistant at the World Bank that
affected her career path? She went through a divorce in 2004 — did that shake
her confidence? When, if ever, has Sheryl Sandberg struggled?
"As a young woman, these are the stories I’d like
to see told. These are the stories that could transform Sheryl Sandberg from an
unattainable role model — almost a goddess, really — to a human being whose
career I can emulate in hopes that one day I, too, can be among the richest,
most powerful and well-adjusted women in the world."
That's all true. But as a book that's meant to serve as a "call to action,"
it serves its purpose. Sandberg's challenge and "50/50" view of the world is most directed toward the women and men who are in a position to change the conversation and make decisions that are closer to this "50/50" view. That's when the shift will really begin to happen.
As any entrepreneur knows, you have to sell a vision of how the world should be.
Please follow War Room on Twitter and Facebook.
Follow Aimee Groth on Twitter.
Ask Aimee A Question »
Follow Aimee Groth on Twitter.
Ask Aimee A Question »
Advertisement:
Summary
Sheryl Kara Sandberg is the Chief Operating Officer of Facebook. Prior to Facebook, Sandberg was Vice President of Global Online Sales and Operations at Google. She also helped launch Google's philanthropic arm Google.org.... More »
@jamesxxxxxxx:
No, the problem is that her message is completely
problematic to women. If you are a women and if you are successful enough you
can have a husband that´s going to sacrifice HIS career so that you can be the
main breadwinner at the home. That´s OK. You would not have the closest contact
possible with your children, you would have a stressful working routine, but
it´s a happy arrangement.
There is also the opposite, the more traditional role: you can be women that´s married to a man that´s the main breadwinner at home and you sacrifice your career for your husband. That´s also OK.
On the other hand, trying to be BOTH is impossible and inane(It´s a recipe to being the unhappy and unmarried woman). Women should not seek to be Gordon Geeko just because out of touch feminists want them to be so.
There is also the opposite, the more traditional role: you can be women that´s married to a man that´s the main breadwinner at home and you sacrifice your career for your husband. That´s also OK.
On the other hand, trying to be BOTH is impossible and inane(It´s a recipe to being the unhappy and unmarried woman). Women should not seek to be Gordon Geeko just because out of touch feminists want them to be so.
@jamesxxxxxxx:
And yes, you are right. Sara Blakely, that worked for
TEN years to create Spanx(That remember, could have ended in nothing), shows how
that the path to success is much more complicated than these Out of Touch
Feminists(tm) thinks.
on Mar 11, 7:55 AM said:
@André
Kenji De Sousa:
Get real. No woman is going to put up with a
stay-at-home husband for very long.
@dwightmannsburden:
That´s the only way to have women in high paying jobs.
If not stay at home, the man will have to accept a lower paying job to take care
of the house.
on Mar 11, 12:24 PM said:
@DeDe:
LOL! You really do have a chip on your shoulder, doll.
on Mar 11, 7:54 AM said:
She is not a billionaire. Never was. Do you bother with
fact checking at all?
@dwightmannsburden:
errrr.....
http://www.therichest.org/celebnetworth/celebrity-business/women/sheryl-sandberg-net-worth/
As COO of FB, I'm surprised she's not worth more then that.
http://www.therichest.org/celebnetworth/celebrity-business/women/sheryl-sandberg-net-worth/
As COO of FB, I'm surprised she's not worth more then that.
on Mar 11, 12:25 PM said:
@bittergreen:
A better source pegged her at about .8 billion.
Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/sheryl-sandberg-what-holds-women-back-2013-3#ixzz2NU2S3rcx
Join the discussion with Business Insider
Login With Facebook Login With Twitter