Why rising yields won’t stymie dividend stocks
Focus on sectors and styles, and avoid the highest payout
Stories You Might Like
new
Want to see how this story relates to your portfolio?
Just add items to create a portfolio now:
Just add items to create a portfolio now:
- X
S&P 500 Index (SPX)
- X
Qualcomm Inc. (QCOM)
- X
Texas Instruments Inc. (TXN)
By Jonathan Burton, MarketWatch
SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) — A recent bout
of rising U.S.
interest rates has beaten up on dividend-paying stocks, rattling
shareholders who had been enjoying regular income and higher prices from these
so-called defensive equities.
But the end of rock-bottom rates shouldn’t be the death
of dividend strategies. Indeed, some market professionals say investors just
need to be more selective about the types of dividend stocks they pursue.
Jaffe: How to achieve the American Dream
As people aspire to live the proverbial American dream — it’s good to see just how and why that vision looks different now than for past generations. Chuck Jaffe joins MoneyBeat.
“Dividends are a good long-term theme,” says Russ
Koesterich, chief investment strategist at BlackRock Inc. But, he adds, changing
conditions just mean investors will have to look a little harder for
opportunities.
The Federal Reserve in the past two months has made
statements indicating it plans to begin unwinding its massive bond-purchasing
program, perhaps later this year. That’s why dividend stocks stumbled in May and
June, and why investors can expect more volatility should Treasury yields
continue on an upward trajectory.
Higher bond yields make the lower interest
rates on older bonds less attractive — and eat into the appeal of
stocks that were bought largely for their dividend yield.
“People see other alternatives and withdraw money from
dividend stocks,” says Howard Silverblatt, senior index analyst at S&P Dow
Jones Indices.
But dividend stocks as a group have, on average,
outperformed non-dividend peers during periods when the Federal Reserve nudges
interest rates higher, though not by much. A study by Ned Davis Research found
that dividend payers in the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index
(SNC:SPX) returned 2.2% annualized during such times, while
non-dividend stocks in the index gained 1.8%. (By contrast, dividend stocks
trounce non-dividend shares in “neutral” or “easing” periods when interest rates
decline.)
Here are strategies and suggestions from market
professionals who argue there is still room for growth in the right kinds of
dividend stocks:
Highest isn’t tops
For starters, some say, avoid the highest-yielding
stocks. The yield-rich utilities sector of the S&P 500, for example, lost
2.7% from the beginning of April through June, compared with a 2.9% gain for the
benchmark itself.
“High dividend yield doesn’t give you a place to hide in
an environment that doesn’t favor equities,” says Sharon Hill, head of equity
quantitative research and analytics at Philadelphia-based portfolio-management
company Delaware Investments.
Despite their high yields, utilities, telecommunications
and other bond-like areas of the stock market tend to be slower-growing and
debt-laden. Their dividend issuance relative to earnings — the “payout ratio” —
is often extremely high, leaving little room for increases.
Think about sectors
Focus on companies in sectors closely tied to economic
health and whose earnings and dividend payouts are growing. Technology,
industrials, health care and other economically sensitive sectors fit this bill.
In an improving economy, these cash-rich companies will be able to raise their
dividends to keep pace with inflation. Accordingly, they’re a better hedge
against rising rates than more financially constrained businesses.
“Tech companies are paying good yields,” says Charles
Rotblut, vice president at the American Association of Individual Investors.
Among his favorites: Qualcomm Inc. (NASDAQ:QCOM)
, Texas Instruments Inc. (NASDAQ:TXN)
and Cisco
Systems Inc. (NASDAQ:CSCO) , which
recently sported yields ranging from about 1.8% to 2.5%.
...And economic cycles
Cyclical stocks have been the market’s best performers
during lengthy periods of rising rates. Research firm Birinyi Associates studied
nine such cycles since 1962 and found that the technology, industrial and
materials sectors averaged double-digit gains in the six months after interest
rates started to rise, while the utilities and telecommunications sectors lost
ground and consumer staples lagged the S&P 500.
Given that history, investors using exchange-traded funds
and mutual funds that invest in dividend-focused stocks should be mindful of
whether the overall portfolio is cyclical or defensive.
Challenge for funds
A climate of higher rates will challenge more than just
individual investors. Many mutual-fund managers and other investing
professionals have never experienced a prolonged stretch of rising yields, and
not all will rise to the occasion.
Dividend-growth funds with a high concentration of
cyclical technology stocks are particularly suited to the times. By contrast,
many other dividend funds emphasize higher current income and are skewed toward
consumer staples, utilities, telecom and other high-yield, defensive sectors.
The popular iShares Dow Jones Select Dividend Index
(NAR:DVY) exchange-traded fund, which includes dividend growth in
its stock-selection criteria, had almost 30% of assets in utilities and only 3%
in technology at the end of June.
In contrast, the WisdomTree U.S. Dividend Growth ETF
(NASDAQ:DGRW) divides about 60% of its portfolio equally among
technology, industrials and consumer-discretionary stocks.
An actively managed mutual fund with expenses comparable
to the WisdomTree ETF and even cheaper than the iShares Select Dividend ETF is
Vanguard Dividend Growth (MFD:VDIGX) . The $15.3 billion fund,
which recently yielded about 2.1%, had committed 13% of assets to technology
stocks and less than 2% to utilities as of May 31.
Says BlackRock’s Koesterich: “Dividend strategies need to
shift. People need to become more selective.” Otherwise investors may find that
instead of changing with the times, the times change them.
No comments:
Post a Comment