Why Do We Only Look At A 'Few Outrider Women' At The Top But Ignore The Rest?
Facebook COO Sheryl
Sandberg's harshest critics argue that her controversial book, "Lean In,"
is overly focused on advancing women at or near the top, but leaves the average
woman without any real practical advice.
In a recent
New York Times OpEd, Amelia Gentleman agrees with Sandberg's critics:
"Ms. Sandberg’s desire to teach women 'to
negotiate so they get paid more' has only marginal relevance to the millions of
low-paid women in the United States and Britain who have very slim prospects of
increasing their pay packets from the minimum wage that people employed in the
five C’s — caring, cashiering, catering, cleaning and clerical work — can
expect."
Gentleman argues that we've
pursued feminism at the expense of inequality. She looks at a study by the Institute
for Public Policy Research, pointing out that "the report wonders
why we persist in looking at a few outrider women at the top of the professional
ladder instead of analyzing the fate of a more representative cross-section of
women."
While we've made incremental gains at the top — and certainly come a long way
— women still hold many of the low-skilled jobs across most industries. The
chart below highlights that trend worldwide (note this does not include the
US):
|
This means we have a long way to go to close the gender AND inequality gaps.
Gentleman says that to create a "fairer feminist campaign," we should take the advice from the IPPR and raise the standards for working-class jobs and create better pay structures across the board.
Feminism is a noble pursuit, but only when it's pursued on behalf of all women.
Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/feminism-is-elitism-2013-4#ixzz2QdhndwIm
No comments:
Post a Comment