on
GM’s New CEO
By Nilofer Merchant on Dec 11, 2013 01:10 pm
A few days ago, I made a comment during a panel
discussion that “sometimes the focus was too much on women and not
enough focus on cognitive diversity” (which I’ve written about, here). I got challenged by a fellow
conference participant that I was simply not getting it, that I was
NOT a feminist, and… that I was being “politically correct”.
Oh, geez.
Now let me tell you… I get accused of a lot of things. But,
I rarely get accused of — i.e. never, in fact, except this once —
that I am “politically correct”.
The research is what pulls this point of view. That if
10/10 people in a group are women, the group/team/organization all
have the same failures that an all- men team does. ALL of anything
simply isn’t right. But the other thing I’ve come to realize is that
the “women” thing has an evolving thing based on your angle on it. At
first, you see women succeeding and you’re thankful for a role model.
Then you find a bunch of women together and you realize what it feels
like to not be the outcast — to feel “normal” as a successful women
in business. Later you realize the real issue to create fundamental
change has less to with gender but more about including all voices — to
allow many to be seen. I remember reading a great
story of a bunch of kids playing at a children’s birthday party. In
one situation, a gaggle of girls set the rules of the game playing,
and chose something the boys consistently failed at. The girls then
picked on the boys, creating outcasts, and failures. The girls very
much enjoyed this — it felt good to be right and on “the winning
side” more than it felt good to include the other kids, and to create
a fair game everyone could win at. (Why we continue to play at games
only one side wins at is a worthwhile question.) This seems to be the
human condition. If it’s a win-lose scenario, I’d much rather win
than lose, to be in majority rather than the minority. The story
illustrates a truth: Sameness is not the path forward; so, for me,
this is not about women OR men.
But I didn’t get a chance to make that point to this
person making fun of me that day. I got told in the most derogatory
way possible… that I was being “politically correct”.
To which I can only say:
Harumphh.
Kathleen Warner (former COO of Startup America) once
said to me that she would abolish the adjective “woman” if she could
because it’s the least descriptive thing said about most women. This
is not anti-feminism. It is to say, please notice all of me, not just
my ovaries. I am more than my ovaries. I am many things, a set of
history and experiences, visions and hopes that make up my onlyness. Please see me — or any of
us — for who they are. Not with an adjective that describes 51% of
the population. That’s actually quite generic.
I’m building on her idea in this recent post done at
Time Ideas re: GM’s new CEO role:
Who could have imagined a woman being named CEO of a
manufacturing-industry company? Today, for the first time in its
100-plus-year history, GM announced that Mary Barra would be the new
CEO. Almost every headline you’ll see on the news will use the
descriptor woman
even though that refers to 51% of the population. And in truth, being
a woman is the least interesting thing about her. Her most recent
role was to run the $15 billion product-development division. After
her 30-year career within the company, you could dub her the chief
product officer. Her pedigree is flawless with a B.S. in electrical
engineering and an M.B.A. from Stanford. She represents a very
different type of leader, not just because she’s a woman, but because
she wants to reinvent the firm. GM used to have a 10-page dress code.
Who abolished it? Mary Barra. At the time, Barra said that “the key
to unlocking innovation at GM is to trust the people to do the very
best they can.”
But instead of honoring her design prowess, cultural
turnaround, her long arc of commitment, or even her inherent
geekiness, the focus will be on her gender.
Women drive cars. Women buy cars. Women sell cars. Ergo
women run car companies. I dream of the day when her name and
ideas make news, not the fact that she is a woman.
(Thanks to Tom Peters for contributing to this piece, too.
Go to post to see his money quote.)
|
weekend loans online amount that can be borrowed is generally low with shorter repayment term.
ReplyDeletepayday loans over 30 days
small cash loans for unemployed
immediate loans for bad credit
For an effective yet fastmonetary scheme, apply 700 pound payday loans for anytime and from anywhereand overcome all your troubles within no time.
ReplyDelete750 loan 6 months
800 pound loans over 3 months
1000 payday loan
1500 payday loans
If you are looking for quick and effective monetary backing then apply for 1 month loans bad credit without even giving asecond thought.
ReplyDelete12 month loans for bad credit
3 month payday loans no credit check
6 month loans for bad credit
24 month loans no credit check
Payday loans no job verification are the key to unlock various troubles that can make your life a living hell. Applying online is easy as well as quick.
ReplyDeletebenefit payday loan
mini payday loans
text loans today
£1000 payday loans
If you are not having perfect credit and suffering from loads of fiscal crises, it is very easy to qualify same day payday loans .
ReplyDeletePayday Loans No Credit Check
payday loan sunday
1 month loans uk
90 day loans for bad credit
Cash Loans Online No Credit Check are available through the traditional and the online methods. The latter is the most popular method as it is easy and hassle free. There is no need to waste countless hours standing in long queues for applying and availing these loans.
ReplyDeleteInstant Cash Loans No Credit Check Unemployed
easy loans over 3 months
installment loans direct lenders