“Keep your identity small.” — Paul Graham“Identity” has
become somewhat of a dirty word, especially in Silicon Valley circles. In many
minds, the word “identity” goes hand in hand with the word “politics”; a
divisive tool used by politicians to win voters by appealing to religious or
ethnic affiliations.
YCombinator founder Paul Graham even
wrote an essay
about the importance of keeping your identity small. Once your identity is
threatened, he reasons, you become defensive and resistant to change or even
dialogue. Thereby, non-collaborative and non-productive.
I agree that
challenging someone’s identity can trigger defensiveness, but the answer isn’t
to pretend that identity doesn’t exist.
Identity is a core and
unavoidable part of all our lives. Our actions shape our identity, and in turn,
our identity shapes our actions. Trying to pretend that identity doesn’t matter
may make you feel better about yourself, but it won’t affect how others see you,
and how their perceptions shape their actions.
The great irony is that
many of those who, like Paul, advocate the suppression of individual identity
aren’t shy in advocating the construction of strong corporate identities and
brands. Whether you’re an individual or a company, identity matters.
I
believe that each of us should be thoughtful, proactive, and rigorous about our
own identity. Focusing on and answering a few key questions will allow you to
shape your identity and thus your life to better meet the expectations you have
of yourself.
You have an identityAs much as you
might believe that your age, gender, or race is irrelevant, they affect how
others perceive you. In fact, they even affect how you perceive yourself. In a
famous set of experiments, subjects who were primed with different elements of
their identity actually performed differently on tests. Asian-American women who
were primed with their ethnicity did better on math tests than the control
group, and even better than those who were primed with their gender. Doubtless
these women considered the stereotype that men are better at math pernicious and
false; that didn’t stop it from affecting them.
Silicon Valley is famous
for its belief that it is a pure meritocracy, but I’ve noticed that most of the
loudest advocates for this belief are young white men, and most of its other
advocates are older white men.
We all have many aspects to our identities
that even *we* don’t even realize we have. Every action we take, no matter how
seemingly trivial, can have meaning to others, which is why it’s critical to be
thoughtful about shaping our identities.
Defining your identityYour identity is your
vector; it is a path defined by what you do and why you do it. By indicating
your direction, it helps you define your available options. Like an
old-fashioned newspaper reporter, your identity helps you sharpen your answers
to the 6 Ws: Who, What, Where, When, Why, and hoW.
What: What
you stand for in the world. You have to stand for distinct things, not
platitudes. One of the biggest reasons I’m an advocate for identity is because I
believe in this “What”. We are all moral agents, and we need to be thoughtful
about what we stand for. “Why am I a good person?” isn’t just a rhetorical
question.
Who: Who you stand with. Who’s in your network? Whose
networks do you belong to? Part of the reason I wanted to respond to Paul’s
essay is the fact that Paul is someone that I stand with. Ironically enough,
Paul is incredibly clear about whom he stands with; Paul is all about helping
technologists and engineers have an impact on the world.
How:
How you manifest your identity. What are the key things you’re going to do? One
of the reasons I chose to write this essay is that I believe writing is one of
the best ways to help thoughtful people evolve their views. Writing makes it
clear what I stand for in a very public and shareable
way.
Where: Where you stand is also an integral part of your
identity. Geography matters. If your identity includes becoming a successful
software entrepreneur, you ought to be in Silicon Valley. Strong entrepreneurs
recognize that they’re much more likely to succeed in Silicon Valley than
anywhere else.
Why: Why do you take a stand? We are moral actors
in this world, and we should be conscious about the reasons we take a stand. If
you treat this as an unconscious, unshapeable thing, that’s bad for the world.
The “Why” of your identity is something that binds all of your choices together,
and frequently comes down to a statement of principle. I believe in a number of
key principles that I apply to myself and the world at large: A world of
diminished violence, reaching human potential, getting to truth through
intellectual discourse, and universal civil rights that apply to all people, all
cultures, and all societies.
When: When do you act on your
stance? When are you willing to take on risk, suffering, or pain? Frequently,
the answer is “When it’s really important,” which ties into the “Why” of your
identity.
Coming up with these answers can be hard, even uncomfortable,
but it is essential. You can’t just go with the flow on everything. Neither
absolute flexibility nor inflexibility is a practical approach to life. Even
someone as notoriously insistent on getting his way as Steve Jobs reflects this
principle. Steve was inflexible on things like design and user experience, but
he chose those things thoughtfully and with a purpose. When you know the answers
to these questions, you’re much better equipped to lead a life that reflects
your beliefs and values.
The rise of Network
IdentityOne exciting development for constructing a thoughtful
identity is the rise of what I call “Network Identity.” There are key
differences between a traditional group identity and the new network identity. A
traditional group has a set of members, and is the same for each member. A
network, on the other hand, is different for each individual. Unlike a
community, networks can overlap while still being different.
We like to
say things like “You are what you eat,” to reflect the reality that your diet is
one of the most critical inputs to your health. In the same way, network
identity states, “You are whom you choose to befriend.” The sum of your network
provides others with a valuable way of gauging your individual identity. When I
meet someone new, like many, I look them up on LinkedIn. Looking at their
position in the network, especially our set of mutual friends, is one of the
strongest inputs into how I perceive them.
Just as with your personal
identity, you build your network identity through the choices you make. The good
news is, for most of us, choosing whether or not you want to have a relationship
with someone is easier than deciding what abstract principles to follow. The bad
news is, most of us don’t actively and explicitly terminate our friendships, so
sometimes our roster of friends makes an unintended impression. Even here,
however, you need to be thoughtful; “my friend, right or wrong” is just as
misguided as “my country, right or wrong.”
Defending your
identityPaul Graham’s approach of keeping your identity small
may help keep conflicts from arising over your identity, but in fact this could
actually be negative. Your identity helps you define key borders and boundaries
(Where and When). You have to choose what you’re going to advocate and defend
(What and Why). If you don’t enforce the integrity of your identity, you’ll lose
it. In other words, if you talk the talk, you have to walk the
walk.
Saying you’re a “good person” is meaningless unless you actually
*act* on behalf of others. If you thought the invasion of Iraq was a mistake,
what did you personally do about it? If you think the US shouldn’t support
autocratic regimes, what are you doing about it? Only Tweeting doesn’t really
count.
This can be a fine line to walk; I think of it as the difference
between being principled and self-righteous. You should follow the principles
behind your identity; you shouldn’t seek out conflict as an act of
self-aggrandizement.
Choose your own
identityIdentity comes from choice; choice comes from identity.
On a daily basis, the actions you take, the people you spend time with, and the
principles you choose to defend will define your identity. Therefore, you should
choose to construct an identity that signals to the world your core values and
unique choices.
P.S. It hardly seems fair for me to pontificate about
personal identities without sharing how I view my own identity. Not all of you
will agree with the principles I follow, but understanding them will certainly
help us have a productive dialogue. Here are some of the ways that I
characterize myself:
- Progressive
- Technocrat
- American
- Intellectual
- Mystical
- Meritocratic
- Friend
(Thanks to Chris
Yeh and Ben Casnocha for their help on this essay.)
Reid Hoffman
Entrepreneur. Product Strategist. Investor.
Shape Your Identity Or It Will Shape You
“Identity” has become somewhat of a dirty word, especially in Silicon Valley circles. In many minds, the word “identity” goes hand in hand with the word “politics”; a divisive tool used by politicians to win voters by appealing to religious or ethnic affiliations.
YCombinator founder Paul Graham even wrote an essay about the importance of keeping your identity small. Once your identity is threatened, he reasons, you become defensive and resistant to change or even dialogue. Thereby, non-collaborative and non-productive.
I agree that challenging someone’s identity can trigger defensiveness, but the answer isn’t to pretend that identity doesn’t exist.
Identity is a core and unavoidable part of all our lives. Our actions shape our identity, and in turn, our identity shapes our actions. Trying to pretend that identity doesn’t matter may make you feel better about yourself, but it won’t affect how others see you, and how their perceptions shape their actions.
The great irony is that many of those who, like Paul, advocate the suppression of individual identity aren’t shy in advocating the construction of strong corporate identities and brands. Whether you’re an individual or a company, identity matters.
I believe that each of us should be thoughtful, proactive, and rigorous about our own identity. Focusing on and answering a few key questions will allow you to shape your identity and thus your life to better meet the expectations you have of yourself.
You have an identity
As much as you might believe that your age, gender, or race is irrelevant, they affect how others perceive you. In fact, they even affect how you perceive yourself. In a famous set of experiments, subjects who were primed with different elements of their identity actually performed differently on tests. Asian-American women who were primed with their ethnicity did better on math tests than the control group, and even better than those who were primed with their gender. Doubtless these women considered the stereotype that men are better at math pernicious and false; that didn’t stop it from affecting them.
Silicon Valley is famous for its belief that it is a pure meritocracy, but I’ve noticed that most of the loudest advocates for this belief are young white men, and most of its other advocates are older white men.
We all have many aspects to our identities that even *we* don’t even realize we have. Every action we take, no matter how seemingly trivial, can have meaning to others, which is why it’s critical to be thoughtful about shaping our identities.
Defining your identity
Your identity is your vector; it is a path defined by what you do and why you do it. By indicating your direction, it helps you define your available options. Like an old-fashioned newspaper reporter, your identity helps you sharpen your answers to the 6 Ws: Who, What, Where, When, Why, and hoW.
What: What you stand for in the world. You have to stand for distinct things, not platitudes. One of the biggest reasons I’m an advocate for identity is because I believe in this “What”. We are all moral agents, and we need to be thoughtful about what we stand for. “Why am I a good person?” isn’t just a rhetorical question.
Who: Who you stand with. Who’s in your network? Whose networks do you belong to? Part of the reason I wanted to respond to Paul’s essay is the fact that Paul is someone that I stand with. Ironically enough, Paul is incredibly clear about whom he stands with; Paul is all about helping technologists and engineers have an impact on the world.
How: How you manifest your identity. What are the key things you’re going to do? One of the reasons I chose to write this essay is that I believe writing is one of the best ways to help thoughtful people evolve their views. Writing makes it clear what I stand for in a very public and shareable way.
Where: Where you stand is also an integral part of your identity. Geography matters. If your identity includes becoming a successful software entrepreneur, you ought to be in Silicon Valley. Strong entrepreneurs recognize that they’re much more likely to succeed in Silicon Valley than anywhere else.
Why: Why do you take a stand? We are moral actors in this world, and we should be conscious about the reasons we take a stand. If you treat this as an unconscious, unshapeable thing, that’s bad for the world. The “Why” of your identity is something that binds all of your choices together, and frequently comes down to a statement of principle. I believe in a number of key principles that I apply to myself and the world at large: A world of diminished violence, reaching human potential, getting to truth through intellectual discourse, and universal civil rights that apply to all people, all cultures, and all societies.
When: When do you act on your stance? When are you willing to take on risk, suffering, or pain? Frequently, the answer is “When it’s really important,” which ties into the “Why” of your identity.
Coming up with these answers can be hard, even uncomfortable, but it is essential. You can’t just go with the flow on everything. Neither absolute flexibility nor inflexibility is a practical approach to life. Even someone as notoriously insistent on getting his way as Steve Jobs reflects this principle. Steve was inflexible on things like design and user experience, but he chose those things thoughtfully and with a purpose. When you know the answers to these questions, you’re much better equipped to lead a life that reflects your beliefs and values.
The rise of Network Identity
One exciting development for constructing a thoughtful identity is the rise of what I call “Network Identity.” There are key differences between a traditional group identity and the new network identity. A traditional group has a set of members, and is the same for each member. A network, on the other hand, is different for each individual. Unlike a community, networks can overlap while still being different.
We like to say things like “You are what you eat,” to reflect the reality that your diet is one of the most critical inputs to your health. In the same way, network identity states, “You are whom you choose to befriend.” The sum of your network provides others with a valuable way of gauging your individual identity. When I meet someone new, like many, I look them up on LinkedIn. Looking at their position in the network, especially our set of mutual friends, is one of the strongest inputs into how I perceive them.
Just as with your personal identity, you build your network identity through the choices you make. The good news is, for most of us, choosing whether or not you want to have a relationship with someone is easier than deciding what abstract principles to follow. The bad news is, most of us don’t actively and explicitly terminate our friendships, so sometimes our roster of friends makes an unintended impression. Even here, however, you need to be thoughtful; “my friend, right or wrong” is just as misguided as “my country, right or wrong.”
Defending your identity
Paul Graham’s approach of keeping your identity small may help keep conflicts from arising over your identity, but in fact this could actually be negative. Your identity helps you define key borders and boundaries (Where and When). You have to choose what you’re going to advocate and defend (What and Why). If you don’t enforce the integrity of your identity, you’ll lose it. In other words, if you talk the talk, you have to walk the walk.
Saying you’re a “good person” is meaningless unless you actually *act* on behalf of others. If you thought the invasion of Iraq was a mistake, what did you personally do about it? If you think the US shouldn’t support autocratic regimes, what are you doing about it? Only Tweeting doesn’t really count.
This can be a fine line to walk; I think of it as the difference between being principled and self-righteous. You should follow the principles behind your identity; you shouldn’t seek out conflict as an act of self-aggrandizement.
Choose your own identity
Identity comes from choice; choice comes from identity. On a daily basis, the actions you take, the people you spend time with, and the principles you choose to defend will define your identity. Therefore, you should choose to construct an identity that signals to the world your core values and unique choices.
P.S. It hardly seems fair for me to pontificate about personal identities without sharing how I view my own identity. Not all of you will agree with the principles I follow, but understanding them will certainly help us have a productive dialogue. Here are some of the ways that I characterize myself:
People who read this post also read:
9 Business Books That Will Change Your...
The Most Important Interview Question...
10 Things To Do Every Workday
7 Must-Have (Free) Mobile Apps to do...
Stop Using These 16 Terms to Describe...
The #1 Career Mistake Capable People...
What it Really Takes to Succeed
The #1 Mistake Entrepreneurs Make
Three Killer Interview Questions
Best Advice: What I Learned From Jack...
When a Valuable Lesson at Work Became...
Failure Is Not The Worst Outcome,...
Why It's Time to Break the Code of...
Things I Carry: Smart Phone? I Prefer a...
The 3 Biggest Resume Mistakes
The Mental Shift That Can Change...
Startup to the Power of 10
Best Advice: You Can Do Anything You...
Andrew Mason's Daily Deal: 'I Got Fired...
10 things bosses hate